Benefits of Mobile-Assisted
Language Learning Tools


Extempore activities fit within what the field of foreign language pedagogy calls Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL) tasks, a subset of the broader area of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC). The use of MALL tasks – and CMC in general – in the foreign language classroom has proved beneficial for learners in two important ways: it promotes learners’ language development, including oral proficiency, and it can reduce anxiety, consequently increasing motivation and positive attitudes towards learning.

Early studies on the use of CMC tasks in the foreign language classroom established a positive relationship between the use of these tasks and language development (Abrams, 2003; Beauvois 1997; Blake, 2000; Kost, 2004; Payne & Whitney, 2002). Research that examines the curricular integration of CMC oral tasks, both synchronous and asynchronous, reveals students’ gains in areas of oral proficiency, such as comprehensibility and fluency (Dunn, 2012), as well as amount of output (Gromik, 2012; Yanguas & Flores, 2014), pragmatic competence (Sykes, 2005), and pronunciation (Anaraki, 2009).

Research also shows that learners who are given supplemental spoken practice outside of the classroom using their computers or mobile devices usually outperform learners in the control groups in oral proficiency measures (Al-Jarf, 2012; Anaraki, 2009; Hsu, Wang & Comac, 2008; Yang, Lai & Chu, 2005). When compared to oral tasks completed in a computer lab setting, Kesseler (2010) observed that recordings submitted with an audio mobile device scored better in different speaking fluency measures (namely, pausing, rate of speech, utterance length and volume) than those recorded in the computer lab.

MALL has been shown to reduce anxiety in the foreign language classroom. Unlike students using computers in the audio lab, participants using mobile devices in Kessler’s (2010) study reported less self-consciousness and anxiety when completing the speaking tasks. In addition to reduced speaking anxiety, research also shows that learners, especially younger ones, exhibit positive attitudes towards the use of mobile-assisted language learning tasks (Ally, Tin & Woodburn, 2011; Al-Shehri, 2011; Belanger, 2005; Yanguas & Flores, 2014) and those attitudes often result in increased motivation to produce more language (Yanguas & Flores, 2014)..

A number of studies have also examined how learners perceive the benefits of MALL technology integration for their own learning. In general, students who are asked about the effectiveness of MALL technology report improvement of their learning (Abdous, Camarena & Facer, 2009; Ally, Tin & Woodburn, 2011; Amer, 2010; Cooney & Keogh, 2007; Facer, Abdous & Camarena, 2009; Gromik, 2012; Sun, 2009) and greater autonomy, that is, the technology helps students feel more in charge of their own learning (Al-Jarf, 2012; Palfreyman, 2012).

Research on the use of mobile-assisted language learning tools is a relatively new and rapidly growing field. The primary pedagogical implications that we can derive from this incipient body of knowledge is that making mobile applications, such as Extempore, a part of the learning process is generally well received by students; it results in increased practice; and, therefore, it promotes language development.



References


Abdous, M., Camarena, M., & Facer, B. (2009). MALL technology: Use of academic podcasting in the foreign language classroom. RECALL Journal, 21(1), 76–95.
Abrams, Zsuzsanna I. (2003). The Effect of Synchronous and Asynchronous CMC on Oral Performance in German. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2) 157-167.
Al-Jarf, R. (2012). Mobile technology and student autonomy in oral skill acquisition. In J. Díaz-Vera (Ed.), Left to my own devices: Learner autonomy and mobile-assisted language learning innovation and leadership in English language teaching (pp. 105–130). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
Ally, M., Tin, T., & Woodburn, T. (2011). Mobile learning: Delivering French using mobile devices. Proceedings 10th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (mLearn) (p. 448). Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University.
Al-Shehri, S. (2011). Context in our pockets: Mobile phones and social networking as tools of contextualising language learning. Proceedings 10th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (mLearn) (pp. 278–286). Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University.
Amer, M. (2010). Idiomobile for learners of English: A study of learners’ usage of a mobile learning application for learning idioms and collocations. PhD dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Anaraki, F. (2008). A Flash-based mobile learning system for learning English as a second language. ABAC Journal, 28(3), 25-35.
Beauvois, M. H. (1997). Write to speak: The effects of electronic communication on the oral achievement of fourth semester French students. In J. Muyskens (Ed.), New ways of learning and teaching: Issues in language program direction (pp. 93-116). Boston: Heinle.
Belanger, Y. (2005). Duke University iPod first year experience final evaluation report. Center for Instructional Technology. Duke University
Blake, R. (2000). Computer-mediated communication: A window on FL Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4, 120-136.
Cooney, G., & Keogh, K. A. (2007). Use of mobile phones for language learning and assessment for learning, a pilot project. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Mobile Learning, Melbourne, Australia.
Dunn, Melanie G. (2012). The effect of VoiceThread integration on high school students’ anxiety and oral proficiency in the foreign language classroom. Doctoral Dissertation, Liberty University.
Facer, B., Abdous, M., & Camarena, M. (2009). The Impact of Academic Podcasting on Students: Learning Outcomes and Study Habits. In R. de Cassia Veiga Marriott & P. Lupion Torres (Eds.) Handbook of research on e-learning methodologies for language acquisition. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Gromik, N. (2012). Cell phone video recording feature as a language learning tool: A case study. Computers & Education, 58(1), 223–230.
Hsu, H-Y., Wang, S-K., & Comac, L. (2008). Using audioblogs to assist English-language learning: an investigation into student perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 181–198.
Kessler, G. (2010): Fluency and anxiety in self-access speaking tasks: The influence of environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(4), 361–375.
McNeil, Levi. (2014). Ecological Affordance and Anxiety in an Oral Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Environment. Language Learning and Technology, 18(1), 142-159.
Palfreyman, D. (2012). Bringing the world into the institution: Mobile intercultural learning for staff and students. In J. Díaz-Vera (Ed.), Left to my own devices: Learner autonomy and mobile-assisted language learning innovation and leadership in English language teaching (pp. 163–181). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing
Payne, J. S., & Whitney, P. J. (2002). Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20, 7-32.
Sun, Y. C. (2009). Voice blog: An exploratory study of language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 13(2), 88–103.
Sykes, J. M. (2005). Synchronous CMC and pragmatic development: Effects of oral and written chat. CALICO Journal, 22, 399-431.
Yang, J-C., Lai, C-H., & Chu, Y-M. (2005). Integrating speech technologies into a one-on-one digital English classroom. Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (pp. 159–163).
Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
Yanguas, I. & Flores, A. (2014). Learners’ willingness to communicate in face-to-face versus oral computer-mediated communication. The JALT CALL Journal, 10(2), 83-103.