Extempore Announces Strategic Partnership with 3ipunt to Expand Presence in Europe
Extempore is pleased to announce a strategic partnership with 3ipunt, a leading e-learning consultancy and technology…
Another review of 131 studies with a total of 12,652 participants, Kluger & DeNisi (1996), found that feedback is more effective when it focuses on correct, rather than incorrect, performance, when it informs about changes from previous performance, and when it relates to specific goals. In other words, the more focused on positive evidence and the more goal-oriented our feedback is, the more impact it will have on student achievement. Spending our grading time correcting students’ grammatical mistakes and writing long narratives to cover every single aspect of a student’s performance on a task is simply a waste of our time.
There are only a finite number of hours in each workday, and the time we devote to grading needs to be as effective as possible to promote student learning. If you’re one of those teachers who thinks they should comment on absolutely every mistake a student makes, it’s time to re-think your approach to feedback. Think about food: nutritious food is good, but it’s not true that the more nutritious food you intake, the better for your health.
Rethinking feedback is particularly relevant when it comes to assessing speaking skills. Teachers often resist collecting evidence of their students’ oral performance for fear of having to “grade” hundreds of recordings. What they “fear” is a particular approach to providing feedback that consists of commenting on every single thing a student did wrong.
My challenge for you this week: